|
Emperor's Clothes Newsletter * 2 December 2008 The Emperor’s New Clothes (TENC) * www.tenc.net You may send this article or the link to any person or Internet list. You may post any TENC article on the Internet as long as you cite Emperor’s Clothes as the source, credit the author(s), and state the URL, which in this case is http://emperors-clothes.com/forget.htm Subscribe to the TENC Newsletter – Receive articles from Emperor’s Clothes. To join, send a blank email to: join-emperorsclothes@pr2.netatlantic.com Then reply to the confirmation email; if you don’t receive it right away, please check your email screening filter. And please add the Newsletter address to your personal address book: emperorsclothes@tenc.net Our readers make TENC possible. Please donate! ========================================== The Weathermen Redeemed, Part 3: Obama Forgets the Early ’80s (and the Weathermen) by Jared Israel Edited by Samantha Criscione [Nov. 21, 2008; updated Nov. 28, 2008] Part 1: Obama and Ayers: The Provocateur Exhumed http://emperors-clothes.com/exhumed.htm Part 2: Obama and Ayers:Obama’s “I-was-only-8” Lie http://emperors-clothes.com/8yearslie.htm ========================================== In Part One of this series I predicted that the Republican attack on, and the Democratic defense of, Barack Obama for alleged links to Weathermen Bill Ayers and wife Bernardine Dohrn would position Dohrn and Ayers as controversial media celebrities, rather than pariahs, which they should be, especially for anyone who opposed the Vietnam war (or who would have opposed it, had they been old enough). Alas, my prediction is coming true. The Republicans have portrayed the Weathermen as 1960s student radicals and terrorists, as if the two were one and the same. By casting Ayers and Dohrn as representative of the 1960s student movement, the Republicans have encouraged anyone who thinks the Vietnam war was wrong to sympathize with the Weathermen. The Democrats have minimized the Weathermen’s crimes, depicting them as an extreme expression of a split in U.S. society, which must now be healed, while describing Ayers as a credit to mankind. In fact, Weatherman values were the antithesis of the student movement of the 60s, which is why, unable to dominate Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the Weathermen did their best to destroy it. Currently the more conservative Republicans have been the main ones attacking the Weathermen, which fact has been used to create the impression that anyone harshly condemning the Weathermen must be an ultra-Rightist, thus polarizing the issue. My critique does not come from the Right. It comes from concern (perhaps concern is too mild a word) over the gangsterization of politics, regarding which the Weathermen are prophets and cheerleaders. Taking some of the Weatherman rhetoric at face value, the Right accepts their self-description as the extreme of opposition to the Establishment. For me (and I am not alone) in their glorification of gangsterism-with-a-left-sounding-facade, the Weathermen have been the vanguard of the Establishment. (Consider for example Zbigniew Brzezinski and Zalmay Khalilzad’s promotion of the so-called ‘Afghan Arabs’ as freedom fighters, in 1985. [1] ) And after all, how many people who have publicly taken credit for Class A felonies including murder can boast that the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ordered a U.S. presidential candidate to stop talking about them? [2] I know the Weathermen all too well from fighting them before and after they left SDS. In 1969 in SDS I raised many of the same points about the Weathermen that I am making now. I believe I am speaking for thousands of people who were involved in the student movement in the 1960s, whose voices are not being heard. ========================================== Mummies, arise! ========================================== In Part One I argued that the current whitewash of the Weathermen shows that the Establishment is airing out the Dohrn-Ayers mummies so the media may once again levitate them as Oracles of the Left. My argument was counterintuitive because ever since Obama was first questioned about his relations with Ayers and Dohrn, these Weatherman leaders refused to utter a squeak. However, immediately the election was over, the Weather-leaders had Weather-justifying interviews on Democracy Now!, which has a big audience on the Left, such as it is, on the top ABC TV daytime program, “Good Morning America,” and on National Public Radio (NPR). (In just two days, NPR managed to broadcast three programs featuring Ayers.) [3] Perhaps these appearances should be called not interviews but advertising, both for Ayers’ book and for the Weathermen, since the hosts not only failed to challenge Ayers’ lies, but treated him with reverence. NPR has been running a free advertisement for Ayers’ book, telling listeners that if they buy it NPR will get a commission. As Ayers would say, ain’t America great?
The whole time Ayers was interviewed on “Good Morning America,” ABC ran the following screen title, which says more about ABC than about Ayers:
Notice that ABC didn’t use the screen title,
“William Ayers presents his side.” That would have been neutral.
Instead, according to ABC, he “sets the record straight”; a partisan
description. So the media’s
Weatherman Redemption Project (WRP) has reached the point where the
unpunished and self-glorifying Mr. Ayers constitutes
Respectability, Unjustly Accused, compelled to refute tiresome slanders.
Notice the repetition verging on self-parody, an effect
enhanced by
Obama’s complaint, made on ABC Television, that he has had to repeat his
‘I was only eight in 1969 when the Weathermen were active’ mantra “many times.”
[6]
Notice that while telling us the Weathermen did
“despicable”
[8]
things only in 1969 (thus lying about the Weathermen) Obama also tells
us that he was too young to be aware when they were active. This is also a lie. A lie within a lie.
(Ironically, this headline highlights the point that while the
Weathermen started in 1969 they certainly didn’t end
then, thus
refuting Obama’s ‘Weathermen-were-[only]-active-in-1969’ claim
twenty-seven years before he made it.)
The media coverage continued, intensively. As late as September 1983, after Obama had graduated and was reportedly working at a New York newsletter company [see footnote 9], Time Magazine reported:
Obama would have noticed the Brink’s robbery-murder even if it did not
compel attention. But it did. Not only were several Weathermen arrested,
but the crime was:
Newsweek reported:
– Newsweek, Nov. 2, 1981 [14] Trombino’s arm was practically severed at the shoulder. A third guard
was shot in the head.
– The New York Times, October 21, 1981 [15] Hollow-nose bullets are designed to expand on impact, maximizing damage.
– ibid. So: a gang, including Weathermen, plus over-the-top violence. How could
anyone forget this story?
(Three years later, in
February 1984, the Washington Post reported that Ayers and Dohrn
were still living in the Upper West Side.) [17]
But earlier in the same article we are told:
Notice: no “former.” Boudin and Clark are presented as members of the Weather Underground “terrorist group” when their names come up separately from Dohrn and Ayers, but they morph into “former” members of the Weather Underground, with no reference to terror, when their names come up in conjunction with Dohrn and Ayers. This is not a fluke. It follows a pattern in the coverage of the Brink’s affair throughout the early ’80s: arrested Weathermen are usually referred to as Weathermen, or members of the Weather Underground, present tense; but immediately Dohrn and Ayers are present, all become “former,” and poof! – the Weather Underground is dissolved. As in all magic tricks, the hand is quicker than the eye. Having the public misperceive Weatherman founders Dohrn and Ayers as “former” headed off awkward questions, and still does: A) Why were Dohrn and Ayers never jailed for Weatherman felonies – indeed, for a string of felonies arguably constituting a racketeering conspiracy under Federal law – for which Dohrn took credit at the time, and of which Dohrn and Ayers have publicly boasted since ‘surfacing’ in December 1980? B) Why should anyone believe that Dohrn and Ayers did not continue to consult with, incite and direct the Weathermen in the Brink’s gang, which gang would soon be accused, under Federal racketeering law, of conducting many robberies between 1976 and 1981, involving at least one other cold-blooded murder in June 1981? In labeling Dohrn and Ayers “former,” the media granted them absolution, laying the basis for the current Weatherman Redemption Project (WRP), just as when the English King would pardon a pirate, in return for services rendered (perhaps the very ‘services’ for which he was being pardoned), followed by professorships, philanthropic posts and appearances on “Good Morning America,” and eventually Knighthood. Returning to the matter of location, the New York Times also reported that police investigating the Brink’s job had searched three apartments in Manhattan, and:
Obama states that in Fall 1981 he lived on West 109th
Street near Amsterdam Avenue,
[18] meaning
he lived half a mile from arrested Weatherman Clark; the same distance from the
two apartments the police reportedly searched; and closer to arrested
Weatherman Boudin. So, all
in the neighborhood. How could he possibly forget? |
|
=========================================== Footnotes and Further Reading =========================================== [1] Brzezinski and Khalilzad set up a congressionally-funded company for the stated purpose of teaching the mujahideen how to feed reporters the lie that they were Freedom Fighters resisting Soviet colonialism. See, “Zbigniew and Zalmay’s Excellent Afghan Pro-Terrorist Propaganda Adventure,” by Jared Israel, at http://www.emperors-clothes.com/analysis/zbi-zal.htm [2] See “Powell endorses Obama, chides McCain campaign tone,” The Associated Press, October 19, 2008, by Stephen Ohlemacher, at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081019/ap_on_el_pr/powell Backed up at http://www.tenc.net/a/arch/powell.htm The transcript of Colin Powell’s endorsement of Obama on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press” is posted at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27266223/page/2/ Backed up at http://www.tenc.net/a/arch/powell-msnbc.htm [3] On November 18 and 19, NPR broadcast three (!) programs hyping Bill Ayers, including: his remarks at a books signing, “As Election Spotlight Dims, Ayers The Author Speaks,” Nov. 18, 2008, at http://npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97124808 a 43-minute long interview, “Which Way The Wind Blows: Bill Ayers On Obama,” Nov. 18, 2008, at http://npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97112600 and a 21-minute long faux interview, “Ayers Ends Silence On Obama, Terrorist Accusations,” Nov. 19, 2008, at http://npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97191218 Among Bill Ayers’ other appearances:
[6] “‘Why don’t we
just clear it up right now,’ Obama told ABC News’ Charlie Gibson in an
exclusive interview for World News. ‘I’ll repeat again what I’ve
said many times. This is a guy who engaged in some despicable acts 40
years ago when I was eight years old. By the time I met him, 10
or 15 years ago, he was a college professor of education at the
University of Illinois’” See
“Obama: McCain
Scoring ‘Cheap Political Points’ – Democratic Contender Discusses Economy
in Post-Debate Exclusive with Charlie Gibson,” by Katie Escherich
and Lauren Sher, October 8, 2008
[9]
See
“Obama’s Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say,”
The New York Times, by Janny Scott, October 30, 2007, at |