URL for this article:
Subscribe to our newsletter at http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php
Please send a friend the link to this article to. (Or just forward the article!)
www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes]
In the wake of 9-11, the US and other NATO countries have broadcast the claim that fighting terrorism is their top priority. But is it true? Do NATO and the US oppose international terrorism *in practice*? Or do they sponsor it?
To help answer that, let's focus on how NATO/US forces have related to terrorism against Serbia, especially the province of Kosovo, and against Macedonia because a) these countries have been plagued by some of the worst terrorists and b) NATO and the US now dominate the whole region.
Have NATO and US forces opposed terrorism, supporting a peaceful life for all? Or have they sponsored terror as a central weapon of policy?
As a point of departure, consider the news dispatch below.
It was issued by the NATO command in Kosovo last year, on 24 May 2001. (NATO's occupation force in Kosovo is called KFOR. The command is called COMKFOR)
Here's the KFOR dispatch:
(UCPMB are the initials used by ethnic Albanian terrorists attacking inner Serbia, which is north of the province of Kosovo. As we shall see, the UCPMB is really just the KLA, the supposedly dissolved Kosovo Liberation Army, with new initials.)
1) Note that the headline of this KFOR report speaks of "450 UCPMB members surrender[ing]" but the text suggests that all except a few "serious" criminals were subsequently released.
2) KFOR refers to the UCPMB members as 'extremists.' This suggests people with far-out politics. But these are not just people with very radical views; these are terrorists. They are organized in military units. The units conduct heavily armed raids against inner Serbia. They plant land mines. They terrorize uncooperative ethnic Albanians. They kidnap, torture and kill non-Albanian villagers and all policemen. They ambush Yugoslav soldiers. All of this is illegal; all of it contradicts NATO's UN-defined mandate in Kosovo; much of it is murder. And yet KFOR reports that it has:
On what basis could KFOR have concluded that the crimes of some - apparently most - of these terrorists are not serious?
3) Once the terrorists were released, what possible reason would they have *not to return* to their previous occupation - laying land mines, terrorizing, kidnapping and killing people in inner Serbia? After all, by arresting but then releasing the terrorists, hadn't KFOR made it clear to them and to potential recruits that such activities were acceptable?
Shocking as KFOR's behavior already seems, it is actually worse. For by implementing this soft policy on anti-Serbian terror, KFOR explicitly contradicted the principles and responsibilities laid down in UN Security Council Resolution 1244, under which KFOR and UNMIK occupy Kosovo.
Resolution 1244 states as one of its governing principles:
Inner Serbia is part of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia whose "sovereignty and territorial integrity" KFOR is bound to defend. Does KFOR honor that commitment by freeing 450 terrorists who have previously attacked Inner Serbia and who will now return to that occupation reassured that they are not "serious" criminals? By releasing these terrorists, doesn't KFOR affirm that murderously attacking "the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" is not a "serious crime"?
Here are some of KFOR and UNMIK's official responsibilities, as stated in Resolution 1244:
The 450 terrorists were in fact members of the KLA,
which takes different names depending on which sovereign state it is
terrorizing. It calls itself NLA when attacking Macedonia and UCPMB when
the target is Serbia. Does releasing such terrorists - who are still
armed and attacking Serbia two years after the passage of Resolution
1244 - jibe with:
Let us consider Mr. Clinton's claims one by one.
Regarding this claim, the Russian Press Digest commented:
Reports in other newspapers confirm that the supposed demilitarization of the KLA was a bad joke.
It is therefore no surprise that, following this phony 'demilitarization,' the KLA continued to engage in their established occupations: gangsterism and terrorism. This is documented in the chilling article, "Crime & Terror in 'Liberated' Kosovo" (7).
Number 2, above, actually includes two lies. There is the obvious lie - that the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) is "civic and humanitarian." And there is a hidden lie: by using the term, "established," Clinton suggests that some serious process of organization and training went into setting up the KPC as a "civic and humanitarian" organization.
An article in the Italian newspaper, La Stampa, vividly describes how this UN group, the KPC, was "established":
As La Stampa suggests, and as I discuss later, the KPC membership was not drawn from the general population of Kosovo. Rather the KPC was created out of the whole cloth, from units of the KLA.
Keep in mind that by late September of 1999, the KLA had driven most of the non-Albanian population, and tens of thousands of pro-Yugoslavia Albanians, from Kosovo. Untold numbers of Serbs, Gypsies and others had been killed or kidnapped. Billions of US dollars worth of property had been stolen or destroyed.
But none - literally none - of the KLA leaders or members were arrested by KFOR. They weren't even subjected to serious re-education. Instead, they were given new uniforms, enrolled in an official UN organization and put on salary, courtesy of the UN and KFOR.
And they got a leader. This was Agem Ceku.
In brief, until he was appointed to the top position in the KPC, Agem Ceku led the KLA. Before that he was a Croatian military officer, implicated in war crimes against thousands of Serbian civilians in the Krajina section of Yugoslavia.
Did KFOR and the UNMIK somehow transform Ceku and his KLA terrorists into good citizens after their organization was given the new name, "KPC"?
Well, consider the case of Gezim Ostremi, the KLA commander mentioned in the La Stampa article, quoted above.
The La Stampa article was written 20 September 1999. Fast forward two years to the summer of 2001. Some Western newspapers revealed that Ostremi was leading a terrorist campaign against Macedonia! The Irish Times commented:
According to the Irish Times, Ostremi's role as terrorist chief came as a shock to the leaders of NATO and the UN in Kosovo:
It seems that anytime the leaders of the foreign policy establishment are implicated in some vicious act that suggests not only hypocrisy but criminal misconduct, they and the media put the 'blame' on confusion, inefficiency, bewilderment, lack of preparedness - that is, human error. 'These vast bumbling bureaucracies don't plot evil deeds, they just totally screw up,' is the idea.
Perhaps someone did a study which revealed that ordinary people will forgive any official misdeed as long as the guilty party quickly and freely 'confesses' to stupidity or incompetence (rather than evil intent...)
Returning to Mr. Ostremi, the Kosovo Protection Corp (KPC) Chief-of-staff, how could his terrorist activities come as a surprise to KFOR and the UNMIK?
According to the Irish Times,
Ahh, lack of close supervision, the cousin of confusion and the curse of the 'bumbling bureaucrat.'
Note that not one bureaucrat has been arrested for the criminal neglect involved in allowing the Chief-of-Staff of the KPC, an official UN organization, to run a terrorist invasion of a sovereign state. All is forgiven because 'we all make mistakes.'
But wait. It wasn't just Ostremi that the UN and KFOR overlooked due to lack of close supervision.
Sounds like the whole skeleton of the KLA organization was inadvertently activated, in the form of the KPC reservists, to go off and fight in Macedonia.
You might wonder how KPC 'reservists' would be able to commit terrorist acts on unfamilair Macedonian territory. Wouldn't they get lost?
We comment on these maps in 'Sorry Virginia But They Are Nato Troops, Not 'Rebels:'
For evidence that the KPC terrorists use NATO-supplied weapons to attack Macedonia, and that they are led by U.S. 'advisers,' see 'Emperor's Clothes Articles on Macedonia,' at http://emperors-clothes.com/mac/list-m.htm
This sounds comforting. But Emperor's Clothes has published interviews with eyewitnesses who report the exact opposite: that KFOR and the UNMIK are responsible for a massive reign of terror since they took over Kosovo. For example:
* KFOR opened the border with Albania, allowing KLA-connected gangsters to pass freely between Kosovo and their bases in Northern Albania. (12)
* KFOR watched while people with the wrong loyalties were terrorized and driven from their homes. (13)
* Serbs who remained in Kosovo were forced into concentration-camp-style ghettos, run by KFOR and terrorized by the KLA. (14)
* Those Serbs who remain in Kosovo live in constant fear. Speaking the wrong language can get one killed by making one appear to be a Serb. (14a) Even standing by one's window can be deadly if you are a Serb in one of the new Kosovo ghettos. (14)
UNMIK and KFOR are entirely aware of the monumental terrorism of the UN-created Kosovo Protection Corps. The UN even prepared a special report for Secretary General Kofi Annan documenting the KPC's violent racism and gangsterism. (15) But of course UNMIK and KFOR don't need a special report. These high-power management and military organizations with their redundant intelligence organizations are perfectly capable of seeing what is going on before their eyes.
Consider the following case in point.
On 16 February 2001:
Isn't 'embarrassing' an odd word to use regarding such a crime?
Note that when President Clinton was claiming the Kosovo Protection Corps as a victory for UNMIK, he wrote:
But in its laudably critical comments the Daily Telegraph states that the KPC:
So, even in criticism, the Western media pulls its punches. The demilitarization is accepted as fact in an article which provides evidence that it is a lie! And the KPC is presented as having popped out of the ground like a weed when it was planted and watered by the UNMIK and KFOR.
The arrest of the KPC terrorists who blew up this bus is of course 'embarassing' because:
c) KFOR and UNMIK are responsible for the KPC's murderous attacks.
KFOR and UNMIK apparently recovered from initial embarrassment. They released three of the suspects. The fourth, a certain Florim Ejupi, miraculously escaped from detention in Bondsteel, the impenetrable U.S. military base in Kosovo.
Undoubtedly the detention center guards were 'unprepared' for the escape attempt of this latter-day Houdini, which therefore threw the poor things 'into confusion,' a fact they subsequently found 'highly embarrassing.'
And of course nobody was arrested for letting Florim Ejupi get away because 'everyone makes mistakes.' And isn't the humiliation of it all punishment enough? (On Florim Ejupi , see Los Angeles Times, 15 May 2001) (17)
Contrary to the 'confusion/lack-of-preparedness/we-can't-be- everywhere /we're-just-bumbling-bureaucrats' line which KFOR, UNMIK and the apologist media routinely offer to explain the unending reign of terror in Kosovo, the U.S. Army's own rules hold KFOR commanders criminally responsible for systematic terrorism carried out on their watch:
Holding onto that thought, let us return to the KFOR news release posted at the start. It states that based on KFOR's 'soft policy' toward the UCPMB, 450 terrorists turned themselves in and were subsequently released unless there was evidence they had committed a 'serious crime.'
A few thoughts:
1) Newspaper accounts routinely describe the UCPMB 'extremists' attacking inner Serbia as local Albanians, driven to rebellion by intolerable oppression. But these 450 - 450! - 'extremists' were arrested in Kosovo, not inner Serbia. Obviously they are not people driven by abuse to take up arms; they are part of the Kosovo Liberation Army, now reorganized into the Kosovo Protection Corps, just like the terrorists attacking Macedonia.
2) Under UN Resolution 1244, KFOR must not limit itself to a 'soft policy' which lets terrorist murderers voluntarily turn themselves in and then be released while at the same time KFOR issues Public Relations-style statements, declaring that these people are not serious criminals!
KFOR is obliged to hunt down and jail these terrorists. All of them.
So why does KFOR go through the charade of voluntary detention of terrorists followed by their release? Because this charade is needed to solve a certain sticky problem.
On the one hand, KFOR wants the citizens of NATO countries to think it acts tough against terror. But on the other hand, the KPC terrorists are its creation; they constitute a proxy army used to destabilize the Balkans, which is NATO's strategic goal.
Moreover, these particular terrorists need clear
evidence that NATO supports them. This is discussed in our third
interview (shortened version) with Cedomir Prlincevic, the Kosovo
Mr. Prlincevic explains that in Kosovo Albanian social structure, much power is concentrated in the hands of clan leaders. At the same time, Kosovo Albanian culture is very serious about blood feuds and vendettas, which can last for generations and lead to the deaths of many clan members. Indeed, the 'Canon of Leke,' a 15th century text that describes the proper etiquette to be followed in blood feuds, is highly influential.
This combination - powerful clan leaders who have good reason to fear doing something that might start a blood feud - makes Kosovo Albanian society unusually susceptible to threats from gangster elements. The KLA's strategy for "winning over" these clan leaders (and with them, the clans) has combined a) conducting terrorist attacks on clan members opposed to the KLA and b) providing public demonstrations that the KLA is fully supported by NATO. This tells the clan leaders: these KLA people are ruthless maniacs so if we resist them we'll be saddled with blood feuds for 200 years. And if we fight them, we fight NATO!
NATO wishes to provide evidence that it supports the KLA. Yet it cannot do this openly without alienating Western public opinion. The KLA is, after all, right now attacking Macedonia and inner Serbia. The Macedonian government has, after all, been NATO's faithful servant, doing everything NATO asked. And the current government of Serbia is, after all, entirely pro-NATO. So NATO can't just come out and say it supports the secessionist attacks on Macedonia and inner Serbia.
*Solution To A Contradiction*
By accepting the voluntary surrender of terrorists (euphemistically called 'extremists') and then releasing all those 'not suspected of having committed serious crimes,' NATO resolves the paradox of its duplicity.
The detentions say, 'Officially, we oppose Albanian terrorism!' But the releases say, "Really, we support it."
And that, dear friends, is the truth.
As George Thompson has documented in his article, 'Roots of Kosovo Fascism,' the KLA and the KPC are the political descendents of the Albanian terrorist/fascists who ruled Kosovo as puppets of Nazi Germany in World War II. (20)
By supporting the KLA terrorist/fascists in Kosovo, KFOR and UNMIK leaders have not only violated international law, including the Helsinki Final Act; they have not only made a mockery of UN Security Council Resolution 1244.
They have also put the political descendents of the World War II Nazis back in power in Kosovo. It is a fact that the ethnic Albanian Nazis in Kosovo were the last Nazis to surrender - they kept fighting until 1950. U.S. and Euro policies have, shockingly, brought these, the worst elements among Kosovo Albanians, to power once again. Read carefully the following L.A. Times report regarding the joy of some ethnic Albanians when German troops returned to the Kosovo city of Prizren in June 1999:
We call on KFOR soldiers and UN employees in Kosovo, of all nationalities: implement UN Resolution 1244. Arrest the terrorist leaders of the KPC, responsible for forcing hundreds of thousands of non-Albanians and anti-Fascist Albanians out of Kosovo, for kidnapping and murdering untold numbers of people in Kosovo, inner Serbia and Macedonia.
By doing this, you will obey both international law and your mandate under UN Resolution 1244 and you will uphold your honor as soldiers rather than thugs.
If anyone dares try to stop you from doing this, they are criminals - regardless of rank - and should be arrested as well.
- Jared Israel
(1) KFOR OnLine 24 May 2001 http://kforonline.com/news/updates/nu_24may01.htm
(2) United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) at: http://www.kforonline.com/resources/documents/unscr1244.htm
(3) President Clinton's 16 June 2000 Letter to Congress on U.S. Forces in Kosovo can be found at: http://www.usembassy.it/file2000_06/alia/a0061602.htm
Press Digest, 21 September 1999 is posted at:
by Emperor's Clothes from La Stampa, 20 September 1999, Page 9, "Kosovo,
e' il primo L'UCK consegna agli italiani deposito di armi" posted at:
Emperor's Clothes articles on Yugoslavia, see
& Terror in 'Liberated' Kosovo"
(8) The Irish
Times, Thursday 5 July 2001 "Rebel chief worked for UN funded force in
Kosovo: The leader of the Macedonian rebels was originally paid by the
UN" by Chris Stephen in Pristina. Posted at:
Emperor's Clothes articles on Yugoslavia, see
( "Crime &
Terror in 'Liberated' Kosovo"
Times (London), Sunday 10 June 2001, "Macedonia on brink of war" by Tom
Walker, Diplomatic Correspondent, posted at:
the opening of the border with Albania, see "Gracko survivors blame
NATO." This include a 24 July 1999 Report from Gracko village, sent out
by the Information Service of the Serbian Orthodox Church. With
introduction by jared Israel. Posted at:
For documentation of the charge that a company associated with the U.S. military and CIA created the training camps for the KLA in Northern Albania, see http://emperors-clothes.com/mac/times.htm#z
(13) 'The shame
of NATO: Interviews with Serbian Refugees from Kosovo' posted at:
(14) For a list
of 'Interviews & other Articles that Document NATO Sponsorship of
14a) Cox News
Service, 12 October 1999 "Former University of Georgia graduate student
murdered in Kosovo" by Plott Brice reporting from Athens, GA. Posted at:
(15) To read
the full text of the London Observer article with excerpts from the UN
report documenting terrorist actions by the UN-created Kosovo Protection
(16) The Daily
Telegraph (London), Wednesday 28 March 2001 Page 15 "SAS troops seize
Kosovo bomb suspects" by Christian Jennings in Pristina. Posted at:
Angeles Times, Tuesday 15 May 2001 Home Edition, Part A, Part 1, Page 4,
Foreign Desk, "Kosovo Bus Bombing Suspect Escapes" at:
(18) "THE UNITED STATES ARMY FIELD MANUAL: The Law of Land Warfare,"1956 http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/fieldman.html
BEHIND KLA STRATEGY IN THE BALKANS?' excerpt from interview with Cedomir
roots of Kosovo fascism' by George Thompson at
Many Older Ethnic Albanians Recall Nazi Troops In Wwii As Liberators
From Serbs,' Los Angeles Times, June 17,
1999, Thursday, Home Edition
The following articles talk about the attack on southern Serbia:
Whereas not one member of the Kosovo Liberation Army has been indicted for war crimes - even though war crimes are the KLA's method of operation - a special UN institution, "The International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia" (ICTY) has been set up to prosecute Serbian leaders who have resisted the attack on Yugoslavia. Regarding that body, see:
** Subscribe to our newsletter at http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php
** Please send a friend the link to this article to. (Or just forward the article!)
We get by with a little help from our friends...
Emperor's Clothes receives all its funding from our readers. We are most grateful for any help you can afford to give; small contributions help, and so, of course, do big ones. Our best is yet to come...
Here’s How to Make a Donation...
* Using Paypal
(Visa & Mastercard)
* By credit card at our secure server