The URL for this article is

Click here for a printable version

'If it's freedom you want, steer clear of the forces of liberalism.'

By Mick Hume (Posted April 8,2000)

This question, as Mr. Chris Tarrant might say, is worth 150,000. When quizzed about the accuracy of a past statement during a recent libel trial, who came up with the memorable line 'I was not knowingly not telling the truth'? Was it Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitken, Neil Hamilton or Mohamed Fayed?

Actually it was none of those veterans of the sleaze wars. It was Ian Williams, ITN journalist and seeker after the truth. The 150,00 was his share of the f375,000 libel damages awarded to ITN and two reporters, over an article published in LM magazine (circulation 10,000) three years ago-damages that have already forced the magazine to close, and still threaten to bankrupt myself as LM editor and Helene Guldberg, the co-publisher.

To sit in Court 14 through three weeks of our libel trial was to experience justice through the looking-glass. English libel law is a system where the defendants are presumed guilty unless they can prove their innocence; where a journalist such as ITN's Penny Marshall, who has reported on wars and crises around the world, could claim that being criticised in LM had 'upset me more than anything else that has happened to me', and get aggravated damages for her hurt feelings; and where the judge could sum up by telling the jury, as Nick Higham reported on BBC News, that 'LM's facts might have been right, but, he asked, did that matter?' Standing on the steps of the High Court after the verdict, I told the assembled media that while we apologised for nothing, we would not be appealing, since 'life is too short to waste any more time in the bizarre world of Mr Justice Morland's libel court'.

Some of LM's fiercest critics, and ITN's most fervent supporters, have come from the liberal-left media. Meanwhile, many who have condemned ITN's actions and defended our right to publish are conservatives who one might not think of as the natural allies of a magazine that began life as Living Marxism. This line-up reflects some of the strange alliances that have drifted together as we thrash around in the uncharted waters of post-Cold War politics, nowhere more so than in the debate about Western intervention in the former Yugoslavia-one of the issues behind the libel case.

For 375,000 obvious reasons, I cannot repeat the allegations that the article in LM made about the presentation of ITN's famous pictures of an emaciated Bosnian Muslim and a barbed-wire fence at the Serb-run Trnopolje camp in 1992. But I can say that LM has consistently tried to counter the crude attempts by too many in the media to Nazify the Serbs and compare the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia to the unique horror of the Holocaust. For that I have been branded an appeaser, a revisionist and even a 'tinpot Holocaust denier' (the political equivalent of calling me a paedophile) by some liberal-left journalists who have renounced their CND heritage to become born-again members of the Nato fan club, the new imperialists.

>From Bosnia to Kosovo and beyond, journalists who once criticised Western intervention around the world have linked arms with Baroness Thatcher to lead the charge for military action against the Serbs and others. While many of the old school have expressed their discomfort with the notion of journalists embarking on a moral crusade, more liberal commentators seem to have slipped easily into the uniform of laptop bombardiers.

What lay behind this amazing conversion on the road to Yugoslavia? For all their high-minded talk of a humanitarian mission to save Bosnia, Kosovo and the world, it seems to me that the primary motive behind many liberals' new enthusiasm for intervention can be found closer to home. Like Saul, their first concern is with saving their own souls.

By reducing complex foreign conflicts to fairytale struggles between good and evil, they put themselves on the side of the angels. At a time when few of the old certainties seem to hold at home, how comforting it is for the Western conscience to rediscover such a clear sense of moral purpose 'over there'. The crusading hacks are really using other people's life-and-death conflicts as a therapy session through which to give their own lives more meaning. Listen to some liberal journalists talk about a conflict like Bosnia or Kosovo as 'the test of our generation', or as the chance to walk in their father's footsteps on the moral high ground by fighting ithe new Nazis' (the contemporary equivalent of the Devil himself). In the fashionable language of self-help, they are meddling in places such as the former Yugoslavia on an outreach programme designed to raise their own self-esteem.

One aspect of the therapeutic world view that is particularly ruinous of good journalism is the 'privileging' of emotionalism over analysis. With the rise of victim journalism, too much foreign reporting seems to have become an endless search or more sensational images of suffering, which can be cropped out of any proper context and published under headlines about another Holocaust.

According to the code of therapeutic journalism, the feelings of the eye-witness reporter are deemed 'authentic' and those who question them are 'rewriting history'. After the libel case, ITN's chief executive, Stewart Purvis, claimed the verdict as 'a victory for frontline journalism over pundit journalism', while editor-in-chief Richard Tait stated in typically modest style that ITN reports constitute the 'first draft of history' which must be 'saved from the dishonesty of the partisan and the ideologue'.

Their assumption seems to be that eyewitness accounts cannot be questioned after the event-a notion which has dire consequences for critical and comment journalism in newspapers, let alone for the history books. Those who subscribe to the I-Felt-It-So-It's-True school of reporting might like to look at what the infamous 'partisan and ideologue' Malcolm Muggeridge wrote 35 years ago in an article entitled 'The eye- witness fallacy': 'Out of righteousness and sincerity have come more deception than out of villainy and deceit.'

If every issue is to be reduced to a simple battle between good and evil, who wants to hear the devil's side of the story? If your enemies can be branded as Nazis, are not those who criticise you little Lord Haw-Haws who should be hanged and not heard? If victims' feelings are paramount,. how can one tolerate the expression of offensive ideas? Our illiberal liberals will not stand for it. They are even prepared to see the repugnant English libel laws close down an independent magazine, and to hail it as 'a blow for freedom of speech' (Richard Tait). Yet if we are to make sense of these uncertain times, the one thing we surely need is the freedom to express uncomfortable opinions, and an end to the tyranny of the libel laws over a free press.

Never send to know for whom the libel tolls; it tolls for thee.

Mick Hume is the editor of LM Magazine


Order the new video "Judgment"

In 1992 the world was shocked by pictures of a supposed death camp run by the Bosnian Serb government. These pictures were distributed by ITN, the British news station. The worst - a faded black and white photo of an almost skeletal man, naked to the waist, apparently behind barbed wire - stuck in people's minds. These pictures convinced millions that the Serbs were the new Nazis.

The pictures were fabricated - staged and edited to communicate a lie. "Judgment," the new documentary, proves it.

The video relies on footage shot at the same time the 'death camp' shots were filmed. The narration is thoughtful, understated. The film itself shows what ITN chose not to let people see. And it illustrates, step by step, how the phony pictures were created.

We urge you to order the 32 minute video for yourself. It's $20 plus shipping but if you cannot afford the full cost pay what you can. Let's get this video seen by every Western citizen. It needs no introduction. It presents a compelling argument and its conclusions are irrefutable. Therefore it jogs the mind that has been fogged with lies; it jogs the mind to life, to doubt, to think.

We are now raising money to translate the film into Spanish, French, German, Dutch Polish, Italian, Greek, and other languages.


BY MAIL - Send check to EMPERORS CLOTHES, PO Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321 If you are making an extra donation, please tell us!

BY PHONE - all 617-916-1705 from 8:30 am to 4:30 PM Eastern Standard Time

BY SECURE SERVER - Go to Pay the appropriate amount as a donation. Then send us an email so we know that your donation is meant to pay for on or more videos. Send the email by clicking on or email to:

  • Base price, $20.00 Base price in Massachusetts, $21.00 (this includes MA sales tax)
  • Total cost with shipping:

    • 2-3 days within US - $25.00
    • Massachusetts $26.00
    • For next day, in US add $11.00
    • Total outside the US - $26.00

    To find out more about "JUDGMENT!" go to http://emperors-clothes.comFilm/astunnin.htm

    If you find useful, we can use your help...

    All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Right now we are behind on phone bills (we use the phone for interviews and editorial meetings) and for Lexis, the wonderful Internet research tool. Any donation will help with these expenses. To use our secure server, please click here or go to Or you can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321. Thanks.

    To browse articles from, click here or go to and scroll down the page